Abxylute 3D One evaluation | PC Gamer

It is busy and crowded on the market on the earth of handheld gaming PCs. If you wish to stand out, what you want is a few sort of distinctive characteristic. Hummm. How concerning the world’s first glasses-free 3D handheld PC? We provide the Abxylute 3D One.

Truly, this large handheld has fairly a bit extra going for it than simply the glasses-free 3D stuff. For this class of machine, the ten.95-inch IPS show is fairly monstrous. Then there’s the modular building with removable controllers, kick-stand and a keyboard. Oh and it is all powered by an Intel Lunar Lake chip, on this case the Intel Core Extremely 7 258V complimented by 32 GB of reminiscence.

The actual novelty is, in fact, the glasses-free 3D tech. Abxylute describes it as, “digital parallax barrier know-how, probably the most mature and dependable type of glasses-free 3D tech right this moment to stability brightness, monitoring, and viewing consolation.” However I feel it quantities to basically the identical strategy as seen in varied glasses-free 3D screens.

That features the Acer Predator SpatialLabs View 27 I reviewed final yr, which makes use of lenticular lenses and eye-tracking cameras. The Abxylute 3D One does certainly have monitoring cameras on the prime of the show and the ensuing visible expertise may be very a lot the identical as that Acer monitor, albeit in a smaller scale. However maintain that thought, there are a couple of different points to take care of.

Assist for this type of glasses-free know-how is not a given for any specific recreation. Furthermore, there are additionally {hardware} limitations to take care of. By way of recreation help, on the time of writing Abxylute lists 46 video games with “native” help.

You may peruse the complete checklist on Abxylute’s web site. A few of the higher recognized titles embrace Baldur’s Gate 3, Demise Stranding, Starfield, Hogwart’s Legacy and a few Murderer’s Creed installments. However 46 video games is 46 video games. It is not, finally, very many.

There’s additionally an “AI” 3D mode that does not require specific and particular recreation help and will be utilized to any recreation in idea. In follow, whereas it does work on a primary degree, it is so hit or miss by way of accurately mapping depth to rendered objects (together with typically “wrapping” menu components round 3D objects) that it’s not actually usable. Broadly, it is most likely safer to imagine that if a given recreation is not on the supported checklist, the glasses-free 3D characteristic could not work properly sufficient to be usable.

Truly, it is an open query as as to whether you’d actually wish to use the glasses-free 3D tech in any respect. A part of the issue is efficiency. Abxylute has determined to go together with a 2,560 by 1,600 decision display screen for the 3D One. With most handhelds, you’d have the choice of operating at decrease, non-native resolutions the place efficiency is marginal. However not on the Abxylute 3D One. Not if you wish to use the 3D tech, anyway.

Based on Abxylute, utilizing a non-native display screen decision will, “disrupt the 3D interlacing and trigger depth distortion.” An easier model is that it actually would not work in any respect at non-native resolutions.

If that appears like an issue on a handheld operating an iGPU and such a high-resolution display screen, truly it is even worse than you assume. “The 3D One makes use of built-in graphics,” Abxylute explains, “and 3D mode renders two 2.5K frames concurrently, which is demanding. We advocate reducing graphics high quality if wanted, however don’t cut back decision. Some video games could fail to show accurately in 3D if the decision is under 2.5K.”

The efficiency implications of this are all too apparent. 2,560 by 1,600 is one heck of an ask for a chip with built-in graphics. One other niggle entails GPU drivers. Over to Abxylute once more: “Don’t replace the GPU driver. The present model has been fastidiously tuned for the perfect 3D efficiency. A more recent driver would possibly enhance 2D FPS very barely, however might trigger visible points or instability in 3D mode.”

Nice. So, to allow the glasses-free 3D expertise, you are operating at 2x 1600p with previous drivers on an Intel iGPU.

Let’s take Baldur’s Gate 3 for example. It is truly kinda playable at 1600p Excessive settings in common 2D mode. However activate the 3D impact and it is awfully uneven. That is all operating purely natively. Activate XeSS High quality upscaling and the 2D expertise is fairly clean. However the 3D body fee truly will get worse.

Knock issues all the way down to Low settings and native rendering and also you’re taking a look at mid 30s body charges in 2D mode and a reported mid 20s with 3D enabled, however a lot of spikes within the body fee graph that make it really feel even worse than that. Activate High quality upscaling and that improves to border charges within the excessive 40s or low 50s in 2D mode and the mid 30s in 3D mode. However, once more, it seems and feels a lot worse than mid 30s in 3D mode. It is nonetheless probably not playable.

Lengthy story brief, the selection to go together with a 2,560 by 1,600 display screen given the necessity to run at native decision to allow the lenticular 3D characteristic actually would not make a lot sense. Possibly that was the one panel accessible, wherein case you’d must query the entire endeavour considerably. However a 1080p display screen definitely looks as if it could have given the glasses-free 3D expertise a greater shot at being actually playable.

No matter, placing the query of pure efficiency to 1 facet for a second, there’s additionally the precise visible expertise, how good does the 3D impact look? Precisely what you make of will probably be considerably subjective, however this is my take.

First, it is pretty simple to setup, although you do must launch video games from the 3D Zone launcher moderately than, say, Steam. Thereafter, it is a easy case of flipping the 2D/3D toggle change on the highest bezel. And it does truly work and in some methods is sort of spectacular.

Picture 1 of 4

There’s an actual sense of depth, of, properly, 3Dness, significantly for particular person objects or characters. They’ll actually come out of the display screen. It is also very noticeable whenever you change again to 2D mode how flat every part seems, particularly in the event you’re standing nonetheless, in-game. However there are limitations.

Whereas particular person objects are convincingly three dimensional, that is not totally true of the entire scene. The general impact is a bit like a pop-up guide, with varied components positioned at discrete depth positions within the scene, however not a really seamless 3D vista. One other downside is that you aren’t getting a way of wanting by a window right into a life-sized 3D world. It is extra like taking a look at a tiny scale mannequin of every part.

There’s additionally a noticeable step down in picture high quality and display screen brightness in 3D mode. Personally, I sense a level of eye-strain related to the 3D mode, too. Your eyes must tune into the impact, regulate to the lenticular output, and it would not really feel massively pure for a prolonged gaming session.

Picture 1 of three

All of those points additionally apply to the Acer monitor I reviewed final yr. Total, my take that applies to each that display screen and this handheld is that glasses-free 3D tech is superficially spectacular and enjoyable, however solely on rapid acquaintance. It is seemingly not a characteristic I’d use in most video games given the efficiency limitations and even the place efficiency is not a problem, I am undecided the visible expertise totally hangs collectively.

In fact, you could possibly deal with the entire glasses-free 3D factor as a mere additional and assess the Abxylute 3D Yet one more broadly as a gaming handheld. How does it maintain up by that extra standard metric? The 2 most evident issues are that it is each very costly and really massive. The scale of the display screen definitely has some benefits by way of gaming immersion. However it does moderately knobble the portability side in contrast with a lot smaller handhelds.

The Abxylute 3D One is bundled with a protecting carry case, as an example. However it measures over 15 inches or about 40 cm throughout. It is debatable, then, how way more transportable this machine is than a gaming laptop computer. And even in right this moment’s distorted market, you may get an RTX 5070 Ti laptop computer for a similar quantity because the Abxylute 3D One’s present $1,599 checklist value. And that’s an incomparably extra highly effective gaming machine.

That portability arguably will get worse whenever you consider battery life. To offer you an instance, I discovered you could possibly get precisely an hour out of the battery taking part in Baldur’s Gate 3 at 2,560 by 1,600 at low settings and utilizing XeSS High quality upscaling. That is with the 3D One’s energy mode set to balanced the display screen operating a bit of over half brightness.

That is not nice, even within the context of gaming handhelds, that are universally fairly dangerous. A technique of addressing that’s to make use of an exterior energy brick. I’ve a Ugreen 25,000 mAh brick which is about as large as you may tackle a airplane. It is also able to outputting at 145 W, so lots highly effective sufficient. Certainly, it’s going to improve the battery cost as you play. And this is how issues work out.

Roughly talking, draining the battery pack takes about one hour, over which period the 3D One’s battery cost will increase by 40%. Do the maths and meaning the pack offers you an extra one hour and 25 minutes play time. So, even with an exterior brick that is the most important you’re allowed to tackle a business flight and hardly improves this machine’s portability, that is about two and a half hours of complete play time. Not precisely stellar, is it?

Then you definately additionally must do not forget that Intel has not too long ago launched its new Panther Lake chip with a massively improved iGPU. It is not solely a lot quicker, however may match Lunar Lake’s efficiency at a lot decrease energy consumption, with fairly apparent implications for battery life. At a guess we’re no less than 4 or 5 months away from the primary handheld gaming PCs with Panther Lake. It might be greater than that. However in the event you unloaded $1,600 on this factor now solely to search out there are a great deal of way more highly effective and environment friendly handhelds on the market later this yr, I doubt you would be blissful.

With all that in thoughts, you could possibly argue the remainder of the Abxylute 3D One’s qualities are considerably tutorial. For the document the 2 removable controllers have each hall-effect joysticks and monitor pads, and are fairly good to make use of. I significantly just like the tactility of the shoulder buttons. There’s additionally a nifty little dock you should use to hitch them collectively right into a single bigger wi-fi controller, which is a pleasant thought.

Picture 1 of 1

To which you could add a clip-on keyboard and a kickstand behind the pill part of the machine, enabling you to make use of it a bit of like a laptop computer. As for connectivity, there are two USB-C ports and one USB-A. The general construct high quality is definitely sturdy, however the really feel of the plastics used for the primary pill chassis and controllers is a bit laborious and scratchy.

The ten.95-inch show can be fairly good. It is punchy and vibrant, albeit given the lofty value level you might need anticipated an OLED panel. Oh, and for individuals who care about such particulars, the 1 TB SSD is a Zettastone CP300Y, which is a PCIe 4.0 drive, however makes use of QLC NAND flash reminiscence versus quicker and costlier TLC NAND.

All of which suggests it is laborious to be massively constructive concerning the Abxylute 3D One. It’s extremely costly and but pretty clearly compromised. Bodily it is large enough and the battery life is fleeting sufficient that some would argue it’s possible you’ll as properly get a a lot quicker gaming laptop computer for a similar cash. And its essential promoting level, the glasses-free 3D characteristic, would not actually add up. Then issue within the imminent arrival of a a lot quicker handheld chip from Intel, and the Abxylute 3D One feels a bit of lifeless on arrival.

Talking of which, as I write these phrases, it is but to ship out to clients, however it’s accessible to pre-order on the Abxylute web site. Delivery is alleged to “begin” in February, so presumably is imminent, with a US value of the aforementioned $1,599 and the UK coming in at £1,194. Delivery is free inside that value, however it’s not completely clear what the customs and tariff implications are.

Abxylute’s web site says, “clients, particularly these in EU nations, are accountable for paying any required taxes. In the USA, packages over USD$800 could also be topic to taxes.” So, it looks as if you might need to pay much more for the machine shipped and landed in most territories. On the listed value, the Abxylute 3D One struggles to make a case for itself. If tariffs and duties imply it is much more costly than that, properly, that solely makes it even more durable to advocate.

Finest handheld PC 2026

All our present suggestions