A overview of Resident Evil Requiem has been pulled from Metacritic after people seen it was AI-generated. UK-based web site Videogamer.com revealed the overview by writer Brian Merrygold, who does not appear to exist, and whose Videogamer profile image carries the filename ChatGPT-Picture-Oct-20-2025-11_57_34-AM-148×148.png. He’s nonetheless described as “an skilled iGaming and sports activities betting analyst with a deep appreciation for the innovation shaping fashionable playing leisure.”
That is related as a result of since August 2025 Videogamer has been owned by Clickout Media, who earlier this month laid off the location’s editorial workers in a reported pivot to AI content material. Videogamer is these days “all about video and on line casino video games”, with articles like “Finest Crypto Casinos in Malaysia for 2026” and an entire part devoted to betting.
It is bleak. I used to be studying some RE Requiem opinions and located this factor revealed by videogamer. Cannot discover something concerning the author, every thing about it reeks AI (lifeless giveaway being the picture). Low effort, gargabe.Thoughts you, this overview made its solution to Metacritic. pic.twitter.com/awk26P9wSAFebruary 26, 2026
Videogamer’s AI-generated overview gave Resident Evil Requiem 9/10, describing it as “the gory, superb finale the followers deserved”. It briefly featured on Metacritic alongside opinions written by actual folks—together with our personal Elie Gould—elevating questions concerning the integrity of aggregators in an age of AI churn.
Associated articles
Metacritic wields monumental energy within the trade: executives like Take-Two’s Strauss Zelnick and former EA boss Peter Moore have each drawn correlations between Metacritic scores and gross sales figures. Obsidian builders famously missed out on bonuses as a result of Fallout: New Vegas did not obtain a excessive sufficient Metacritic rating.
“Metacritic has been a good overview supply for 1 / 4 century and has maintained a rigorous vetting course of when including new publications to our slate of critics,” Metacritic’s Marc Doyle stated in an announcement supplied to PC Gamer. “Nevertheless, in sure cases equivalent to a publication being bought or a writing workers having turned over, issues can come up equivalent to plagiarism, theft, or different types of fraud together with AI-generated opinions.
“Metacritic’s coverage is to by no means embody an AI-generated critic overview on Metacritic and if we uncover that one has been posted, we’ll take away it instantly and sever ties with that publication indefinitely pending an intensive investigation.”
In response to Kotaku, a number of different latest Videogamer opinions have additionally been faraway from Metacritic.
Other than the fabric results it has on the trade, Metacritic’s primacy additionally has a flattening impact, amplifying consensus and disadvantaging polarising video games. Warren Spector put it finest in 2013: “Metacritic, at finest, rewards video games which are typical and effectively understood by gamers and critics alike. New and difficult issues are, by their very nature, disruptive and simply misunderstood. Aggregation of opinion, at finest, gives hope and steerage to folks whose aim is to maximise profitability however little to folks whose priorities lie elsewhere.”
